College campuses have a reputation for being fertile
ground for discussion and debate when it comes to issues of the day. Public universities in particular are viewed
as being a place where those with alternative views and perspectives cannot
only have a voice but find others who share their perspectives. As a result a university community might not
only have a Young Republican and Young Democrat organizations but clubs
representing extreme perspectives like Socialism and Communism. We expect the same kind of
atmosphere today. After all the current
generation of college students grew up have a reputation of being tolerant and
open-minded.
A recent survey of college students seems to indicate the
exact opposite might be true. The study
was done by John Villasenor, a Brookings Institution senior fellow and
University of California at Los Angeles professor. It was motivated by concerns about the
“narrowing window of permissible topics” for discussion on campuses. John Villasenor conducted a nationwide survey
of 1,500 undergraduate students at four-year colleges.
The Back Lives
Matter movement began as a response to what many saw as the intentional
targeting of Blacks by police officers.
It was to be expected that there would be protest and rallies on college
campuses. It was a cause many young
people identified with. The conflict
arose when individuals with the opposite perspective wanted to express their views
on campus. Many universities cancelled
the appearance of White Supremacist on their campuses because they feared a
violent response. If John Villasenor’s
study is correct they had a reason to be concerned. One in five of the college students polled
responded that it was “acceptable to use violence to disrupt a controversial speaker. Over half of those polled felt it was
acceptable “shout over controversial speakers so they can’t be heard.”
Today’s young people might have a reputation for being
tolerant and desiring to be politically correct but that open-mindedness only
goes so far. When pushed, many college
students will strike back. In such
situation using violence is permissible. And we are left to ask, “Where did
this come from.” Is it possible this is
a learned behavior? Could we, as older
adults, encouraged this behavior by our response to view points and
perspectives that run counter to our traditions or value systems?
As a society I believe we all need to listen more and
talk less. We also need to respect those
who hold different beliefs, perspectives and value systems. We do not need to agree with someone to love
them and respect them. In the process
they might begin to see Jesus in us.
Remember Jesus’ words to Nicodemus, “The Son of Man came not to condemn
the world but that the world might be saved through him.” (John 3:17)
Perhaps we need to condemn less and practice grace more.
No comments:
Post a Comment